There is something that’s been bugging me about the early reporting, commentary and analysis that’s emerged in the wake of the attempted assassination of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Many people are saying this moment – and the immediately historic picture of it – will win the election for Trump. This assessment is coming from both experts and everyday people across the political spectrum; whether they’re pleased, dismayed or neutral about the idea of a second Trump term, it’s delivered with certainty.
But this isn’t a footrace where the winner is decided solely on their own preparation and performance. The voting public determines the outcome. So when someone says “this moment guaranteed Trump will win”, what they’re really saying is that the moment will persuade more people to vote for Trump.
I’m not sure that argument entirely holds up because of how U.S. Presidential elections are typically decided.
Focus on six states
The outcome of the election is expected to be decided by the results in just seven ‘swing’ states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and North Carolina. The state where the attack occurred, Pennsylvania, is particularly important as it contributes the highest number of votes (19) to the final result under the electoral college system.
As much as it makes for good content, the fact that die-hard Trump supporters in states like Kansas or Florida view him as a living martyr won’t make too much of a difference. It’s equally irrelevant if voters in New York or California think Trump’s own rhetoric contributed to the attempt on his life. Voting along party lines is so entrenched in these states, they are unlikely to ‘flip’ to the other side.
And within the swing states, it’s only the opinion of a small group of voters that will matter at the end of the day. According to Axios, the Democrats estimate “’6% of six states’ formulation as a proxy for how narrow a group of voters are considered truly in play.” Republicans are also focusing on a very small cohort “A Trump insider told us that persuadable voters are below 10% in every battleground: ‘I think it’s probably 6% in Wisconsin but 8% in Michigan, and lower in Arizona.’”
Persuading existing voters – not new voters
There is an important word within that statement: persuadable voters. America’s non-compulsory voting system plays a role, with around 40% or more of eligible voters choosing not to participate (with the exception of the 2020 election, with a record 67% eligible voter turnout).
It means the 2024 election will not be determined by convincing new voters to go to the polls, but persuading the existing yet undecided voters. New York Times columnist and former political correspondent on Jamelle Bouie expands on this point on TikTok, pointing out that ‘new voters’ in the 2020 election were evenly divided between Trump and Biden, therefore having no significant impact on the result.
“Undecided voters are [those] who are not only not paying attention, but don’t know that much about the process or anything going on. So what tends to happen is they tend to tune in [during] the fall, and they tend to make their decisions at the last moment.”
This is the group that Biden persuaded to get him over the line in the 2020 election – not because they necessarily supported or even liked him, but because they decided at the last minute that Trump was not an acceptable option.
What will persuade these voters?
The Republican party will absolutely use the now-iconic image of Trump and the story of the assassination attempt throughout their campaign. As Imani Barbarin points out, from a communications perspective “the visual representation of him as a victim will carry him through this election.”
But the election is still almost four months away. The question isn’t whether the idea of Trump as a victim is compelling to any voter, but whether it will be convincing for the small percentage of persuadable voters by the end of October?
There is still a lot of time for the narrative to change and new events to unfold. We’ve had new developments already, with Trump announcing JD Vance as his pick for Vice President just two days after the attack. This is a controversial decision that came as a shock to some. Vance’s politics are conservative and often contradictory, even compared to Trump. The Australian, one of this country’s most conservative media outlets, called the choice “a big mistake”.
Polling is not a predictive science, so always take them with a grain of salt, but it’s also worth noting that across all major polls the gap between Trump and Biden is very small. In those swing states, we’re talking about either candidate having a lead of between one to four points with a 3-point margin of error. In the overall polling, the gap between Trump and Biden has been consistently close throughout the year, with Trump never more than 2.5 points ahead (again, within the margin of error).
We’ve already had several events that seem like they should have had a huge impact, like Trump being convicted of interfering in the 2020 election and Biden’s disastrous debate performance. But these news moments have barely made a blip in the polls.
When more information about the motives of the shooter, Thomas Maxwell Crooks, is eventually released, this may not paint Biden and the Democrats in a damning light, as many in the alt-right expect it to. It’s possible Crooks background may implicate Trump and the Republicans. Or it might have no impact on public perception of either candidate at all.
To be clear, I’m not saying that Trump won’t win the 2024 election. And I’m not saying that the assassination attempt won’t play any role at all. But as it stands right now, there isn’t a convincing argument that draws a straight line from the attack to an inevitable Trump win.
It’s all far too early to tell.
Smart people read more:
Is Donald Trump invincible now? – Triple J Hack
Trump shooting is a warning about how toxic language leads to violence – The Conversation
Unpacking the Trump conviction – Zee Feed newsletter
Comments are closed.